Saheena Khatoon And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46428 of 2018 (2) dt.10-08-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46428 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2016 Thana -MATIARIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Saheena Khatoon, daughter of Reyajul Ansari. null
2. Salhuddin Ansari, Son of Reyajul Ansari, Both are resident of VillageDaraul, Police Station- Matiyariya, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Matiyariya P.S. Case No.14 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegations against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and others.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that after investigation, police has submitted final form against the petitioners but differing with the opinion that learned Magistrate has taken cognizance and there is case and counter case between the parties. Land dispute is from before.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46428 of 2018 (2) dt.10-08-2018 Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Matiyariya P.S. Case No.14 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) N.H./-Sanjeev U T