Arun Kumar Sinha v. State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2580 of 1999 =========================================================== Arun Kumar Sinha, son of Late Madan Mohan Prasad, permanent resident of 55 Anugrahpuri Colony, Gaya, Police Station Rampur, District- Gaya, at present residing in the House of Sri Roy Shivaji Nath, Laxmi Niwas Jagat Narain Lal Road, Police Station-Kadamkuan, District-Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Agriculture Production Commissioner, Sri S.N.P.N Sinha, having his office in Vikas Bhawan, Police Station Sachivalaya, District-Patna

2. Sri Pratiyush Sinha, the Finance Commissioner and Secretary, having his office in Old Secretariat, Police Station-Sachivalaya, District-Patna

3. Sri Amir Subhani, the Director of Agriculture, having his office in Vikas Bhawan, Police Station-Sachivalaya, District-Patna

4. Sri Arun Kumar Singh, the Accountant General(Accounts and Entitlement) II, Bihar, having his office in Birchand Patel Marg, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. VIKAS MOHAN For the Respondent/s : Mr. (GP4) Mr. Dhanendra Choubey(Asccg) Mr. J.P.Karn (Scgsc) Mr. P.K.Shahi Mr. Mukesh Kumar Thakur Mr. Vikash Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-07-2017 Inter alia contending that an order passed on 12.04.1999 in C.W.J.C. No. 9968 of 1999 has not been complied with, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt. Counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent No. 3 and it is indicated in para 6, 7 and 8 that action has been taken and the amounts payable have been paid to the petitioner. However,

Patna High Court MJC No.2580 of 1999 dt.05-07-2017 2/2 due to pendency of certain departmental proceedings certain amounts have been withheld.

Keeping in view the detailed show cause filed by the respondents and the action taken, now it is not appropriate to proceed further in the matter after such a long period of time. The matter stands disposed of. In case, any grievance still subsists to the petitioner in the manner with regard to the settlement of the claim, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to claim the same, in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 08/07/2017 Transmission Date NA