Randhir Kumar Yadav @ Randhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44565 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2018 Thana- RAJAULI District- Nawada ====================================================== Randhir Kumar Yadav @ Randhir Kumar, Son of Late Naresh Yadav, Resident of Village- Manjla, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP 112 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is named in the first information report and allegation is of committing assault and also of theft. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and no overt act has been alleged either of assault or of theft against this petitioner.

Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44565 of 2018(2) dt.30-07-2018 2/2 a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawadah, in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code as well as with following conditions : (I) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person, having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(II) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with evidence.

(III) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Shamshad/- U T