← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3101/2015disposed

Siheshwar Prasad Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary Sri Anjani Kumar Singh And ORS

2017-03-01Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3101 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17776 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Siheshwar Prasad Singh, S/o Late Sita Ram Singh.

2. Pramod Kumar Singh, S/o Siheshwar Pd. Singh.

3. Anup Kumar Singh, S/o Late Kameshwar Singh. All resident of villageHariya Sinhper, P.O. P.S.- Maraoya, District- E. Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary Sri Anjani Kumar Singh.

2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna, Sri Vyasji.

3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna, Sri Amir Sahani.

4. The Direrector, Land Acquisition, Bihar, Patna, Sri Ashok Vardhan.

5. The Jt. Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna, Kamal Narain Singh.

6. The Collector, Motihari, Anupam Kumar

7. The Land Acquisition,Motihari, Kr. Margalam

8. The Union of india through the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India through its Secretary, North Block, New Delhi, Mr. L.G. Goyal.

9. The Secretary, Border Management, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of india, North Block, New Delhi, Mr. Anoop Kr. Srivastava. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mallika Mazumdar For the Union of India : Mr. Ram anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard the parties.

Petitioners have raised a grievance that order dated 28.7.2014 passed in C.W.J.C.No.17776 of 2013 has not been complied with.

Paragraph 5 of the show cause of opposite party nos. 6 and 7 shows that 80% payment has been made and a cheque

Patna High Court MJC No.3101 of 2015 (2) dt.01-03-2017 for rest 20% amount has been prepared on 15.7.2015 but petitioners have not went there to receive their cheque. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to proceed in the matter. Accordingly the present proceeding is dropped.

Petitioners are advised to go and receive the cheque of rest 20% amount.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U