Patna High CourtCWJC/20849/2012disposed

Rajendra Pd. Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-06-18Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20849 of 2012 ====================================================== Rajendra Pd. Singh, son of late Chandrika Prasad Singh, resident of Village Manjosh, P.O. Sikandara, Dist. Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Transport Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Pariwahan Bhawan, Patna.

3. Divisional Manager, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Darbhanga.

4. Depot Superintendent, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Chapra.

5. The Chief of Administration, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna.

6. The Additional Chief of Administration, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma For the BSRTC :

Dr. Anand Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-06-2019 In this case, the petitioner is challenging the order issued under the signature of Chief of Administration, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation contained in Memo No. 6377 dated 23.7.2012 and the same was communicated to the petitioner under the signature of Divisional Manager, Chapra vide Memo No. 694 dated 24.7.2012 by which the petitioner has been dismissed from service.

The petitioner has an available alternative remedy under the Industrial Dispute Act and, thus, he must take steps for redressal of his grievance accordingly.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20849 of 2012(3) dt.18-06-2019 2/2 This Court is not giving any opinion on the merit of the case.

If any dispute is raised under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, the Authority concerned will look into the matter and take a decision in terms of the provision of the aforesaid Act. With the aforementioned observation, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U