← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8422/2023disposed

Ravindra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-01Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8422 of 2023 ====================================================== Ravindra Kumar Singh Son of Surendra Prasad Singh Resident of Maa Tara Nagar, NTPC Road, Near Classic Bhawan, P.S.- Kahalgaon, DistrictBhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Mines and Geological Deptt, Govt. of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Jamui.

3.

The Asst Director, Mines and Minirals, Depatt., Jamui. 4.

The District Mining Officer, Jamui.

5.

Shyam Enterprises Cluster 17, Simariya, P.S.- Gidhaur, P.S.- Jamui. 6.

Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited, A-501, 5th Floor, Building No 4, Infinity Park, Dindoshi, Malad (East), Mumbai, 400097 through Regional Office, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Swapnil Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 For the Mines :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2024 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding upon the respondents to make payment of compensation of Rs 15 lacs which was incurred due to illegal act of the Respondent no 5 in connivance of Respondents no 4 as without verification of the paper the challan of the petitioner's vehicle deposited thrice consequently loss caused to the petitioner and/or pass such

Patna High Court CWJC No.8422 of 2023(2) dt.01-08-2024 2/2 other order/orders as your lordship may deem fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case.

3. In the presence of Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned Special P.P. Mines, Mr.Swapnil Kumar Singh submits that the petitioner has submitted representation before the District Magistrate, Jamui (Annexure-8 to the petition) and it will suffice if the same is taken to its logical conclusion.

4. Without making any comment on the merit of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy before the District Magistrate, Jamui.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U