Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29964 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2025 Thana- KHUTAUNA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Raushan Kumar S/o Raj Kumar Prasad @ Raj Kumar Sah R/o VillageKhutauna, PS- Khutauna, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 352, 351(2), 274 and 275 of BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 930 ml of liquor from a place near newly constructed house of Jai Prakash Bharti.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot nor the liquor was recovered from his house but then it is alleged that during

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29964 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/3 investigation, the accused persons along with 10-15 unknown accused attacked the police force and Shivam assaulted the informant by lathi and danda and Shiv Kumar tried to strangulate him and also assaulted other police officials and damaged the police vehicles. It is further submitted that as far as petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is general and omnibus in nature.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Khutauna P.S. Case No. 139 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

7.

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29964 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 3/3 seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T