Mamta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43933 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.C.ase No. -182 Year- 2017 Thana -SANDESH District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Mamta Kumari D/o Satudhan Yadav, R/o Vill.- Panpura, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.
The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Sandesh P.S. Case No. 182/2017, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is Nanad of the deceased. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 182/2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43933 of 2018 (2) dt.23-07-2018 2/2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 9th, Bhojpur, Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T