Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2399/2018bail granted

Gorakh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-01-17Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2399 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -380 Year- 2017 Thana -BRAHMPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. Gorakh Paswan, S/o Late Chandrama Paswan, Resident of VillageKattar, P.S.-Krishnabrahm, District-Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Brahmpur (Krishnabrahm) P.S. Case No. 380 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-354B & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the written report that this petitioner along with co accused Lalan Paswan pulled the informant and torn her Sari. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that prior to lodging of the present FIR, the petitioner has lodged Brahmpur P.S. Case No. 378 of 2017 against the informant for the offence under Sections-447, 341, 323, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2399 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Brahmpur (Krishnabrahm) P.S. Case No. 380 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will liable to cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T