Sunil Verma @ Suni Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33613 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

SUNIL VERMA @ SUNI VERMA S/o Bachhu Mahto @ Pachu Mahto Resident of Alam Road, Chandramarni, Police Station-Saraiya, DistrictGiridih (Jharkhand). 2.

Vikash Verma S/o Badri Verma @ Badri Mahto Resident of Alam Road, Chandramarni, Police Station-Saraiya, District-Giridih (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kanhaiya Kishore ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-12-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 56(b) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33613 of 2020(2) dt.15-12-2020 2/2 Prosecution case, in short, is that 444.600 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 17.06.2020 and have got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. It is alleged that 444.600 liters wine is recovered from the pick up van in question. The petitioners have got no concern with the pick up van in question nor they are owners of the pick up van. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise Act, Gaya in connection with Excise case No.239 of 2020 (G.R. No.239 of 2020).

Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T