Ajay Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48483 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -159 Year- 2018 Thana -KUDHNI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Ajay Kumar Pandey S/o Late Ramji Pandey, R/o Vill.- Madhoul, P.S.- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Das For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No. 159 of 2018, G.R. No. 1046 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 457, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 Explosive Substance Act, 1980. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of explosion bomb at the house of the informant, causing injuries. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and no incriminating articles have been recoverved from the place of occurrence. It is also submitted that no body has been received any injury and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48483 of 2018 (2) dt.24-08-2018 2/2 n In view of allegation against the petitioner, above named, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and makes prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T