Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40484 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2020 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== PRAMOD YADAV @ PRAMOD KUMAR Son of Late Mahendra Yadav Resident of Village - Bank, P.S. - Mufassil Munger, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Y.C. Verma, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-09-2021 This application has been listed under the heading 'To Be Mentioned' on the basis of mentioning slip filed by the petitioner.
Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. On the order of petitioner, co-accused fired from his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40484 of 2021(2) dt.21-09-2021 2/2 pistol which hit on the left leg behind the knee of the informant and he fell down.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is an advocate practicing in the civil court and according to the FIR petitioner is only the order giver. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody since 07.06.2021.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below/successor court where the case is pending in connection with Mufassil Munger P.S. Case No. 194 of 2020.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T