Ranjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40205 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2021 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Ranjeet Yadav S/O Lalo Yadav R/o village- Bharwara, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Iqbal Asif Niazi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State in Virtual Court proceeding.

Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of start of normal functioning of the physical court.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 12 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 393 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

According to prosecution case, the informant gave his fardbeyan before the A.S.I. Jalley P.S. on 15.1.2021, alleging that on 15.1.2021 at about 18:45 while he was sitting outside of his office at Thakur Petrol Pump some miscreants came on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40205 of 2021(3) dt.16-02-2022 2/3 motorcycles and tried to snatch cash on the point of pistol but they were apprehended by the police.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. He has falsely been implicated in the present case on the on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Bajrangi Sah. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that no case under arms Act is made out against the petitioner and he is in custody since 10.2.2021.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer of bail, submitting that petitioner carries two criminal antecedents.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Darbhanga, in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No. 12 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40205 of 2021(3) dt.16-02-2022 3/3 as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ravi/- U T