Joel Hembram @ Tallu Hembram @ Juvel Hembram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30611 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2018 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== Joel Hembram @ Tallu Hembram @ Juvel Hembram S/O Yakub Hembram @ Jetha Hembrom R/O Village- Bathan Tola Shitalpur, P.S- Azamnagar, Distt.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Malti Murmu W/O Joel Hembram @ Tallu Hembram @ Juvel Hembram R/O Village- Sialtola, P.S- Manihari, Distt.- Katihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Sah For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the opp. party no.2 and the State.

2.Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with C.A. (Complaint Application) No. 465 of 2018 for the offences under section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2 and both parties are ready to settle the dispute.

4. Without going into the merits of the matter, petitioner is granted provisional anticipatory bail for a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in the event or surrender before the learned trial court on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30611 of 2025(7) dt.16-09-2025 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with C.A. (Complaint Application) No. 465 of 2018.

5. The concerned Court is directed to make suitable efforts for the purpose of conciliation between the parties.

6. The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 would have the opportunity to work out an amicable resolution of the issue.

7. If an amicable resolution is worked out within six months, petitioner would be entitled to confirmation of his provisional anticipatory bail.

8. The provisional anticipatory bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by learned trial Court in three eventualities, (i) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored, (ii) if the complainant fails to appear before the learned trial court or (iii) if the complainant gets reluctant to reconcile the issue.

9. With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) mcverma/- U T