Md. Siddik Mansoori @ Md. Siddique Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30000 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- DHANKUND District- Banka ====================================================== 1.
Md. Siddik Mansoori @ Md. Siddique Mansoori S/o- Late Fudan Mansoori R/v- Hassay Ps- Dhankund Dist- Banka 2.
Md. Jibrail Mansoori S/o- Hadish Mansoori R/v- Hassay Ps- Dhankund Dist- Banka 3.
Md. Mahboob Mansoori @ Mehbub Mansuri S/o- Hadish Mansoori R/vHassay Ps- Dhankund Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nawal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhankund P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, F.I.R dated 08.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191 (2), 126 (2), 115 (2), 74, 118(1), 109 (1), 303 (2), 352, 351 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, on 06.07.2025 at about 5:00 P.M., the informant's goat entered the house of Md. Hadish Mansoori, whereupon he allegedly started abusing the informant. When the informant's daughter objected, Md.
2/4 Mahboob Mansoori allegedly assaulted and disrobed her. On intervention, the informant was allegedly assaulted by Md. Nausad Mansoori with an iron rod causing head injury. It is further alleged that when the informant's husband and son came to rescue them, Md. Hadish Mansoori, Md. Siddique Mansoori, Jibrail Mansoori and others assaulted them with lathis and also snatched ornaments and cash of Rs. 30,000/-.
4. After some arguments and looking to the nature of allegation against the petitioner No. 1, namely Md. Siddik Mansoori, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Anticipatory Bail Application in respect of the petitioner no. 1 to avail appropriate legal remedy.
5. Permission is granted.
6. In so far as Anticipatory Bail Application in respect of petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 is being considered, it has been submitted that the allegations against them are general and omnibus while nothing is specific. It is next submitted that both the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application in respect of the petitioner Nos. 2 & 3.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and the nature of
3/4 allegations being non-specific and both the petitioners having clean antecedent, accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Nos. 2 & 3.
9. Let the petitioner Nos. 2 & 3, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IIIrd, Banka in connection with the aforementioned P.S. Case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing
4/4 which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Ajit Kumar, J) surya/- U T