Vivekanand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29661 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2018 Thana- DHARHARA District- Munger ====================================================== VIVEKANAND KUMAR, S/o Damodar Mahto, Resident of VillageLakhochak, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Since the physical court proceeding is non-functional, due to present pandemic, COVID-19, the matter is listed with defects.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within three weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case in brief is that the informant is District Programme Officer, Munger on the instruction of D.D.C. cum Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad Munger, submitted written report before the S.H.O., Dharhara to registered a case against the petitioner as his B.Ed. Examination document is found

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29661 of 2020(2) dt.25-01-2021 2/2 to be fake of enquiry by Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Hariyana.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has already terminated from the service vide Letter no. 331 dated 13.05.2016 by the Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Munger. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail petition.

In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-1st Class, Munger in connection with Dharhara P. S. Case No. 126/2018 (G.R. No. 1464/2018), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T