← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33185/2024bail granted

Abhishek Rai @ Dhela Rai @ Akhilesh Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33185 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2022 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Abhishek Rai @ Dhela Rai @ Akhilesh Rai Son of Harendra Rai @ Kala Rai R/O Vill.- Sukumarpur, P.S.- Rustampur(o.p.), Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 414 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and allegation is of recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a truck. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is neither the driver nor the owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated at the instance of the informant, who claims to have identified the petitioner. It is also submitted that it appears that the informant, in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33185 of 2024(2) dt.08-05-2024 2/2 order to save the real culprit, falsely implicated the petitioner taking advantage of his antecedents.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 220 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 7.

It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases, in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T