← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31455/2023allowed

Birendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-25Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31455 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2022 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== BIRENDRA KUMAR son of Kamlesh Verma @ Kamal @ Kamlesh Singh Village-Bhurkunda Ps-Goh,Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 25-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 506 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of brutally assaulting the sister of the informant, due to which he succumbed to injury.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the brother-in-law (Devar)

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31455 of 2023(3) dt.25-07-2023 2/3 of the deceased. There is no consistent evidence and no eyewitness to the alleged occurrence to show that petitioner has involved in the said crime. On the basis of suspicion, petitioner has implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the husband of the deceased has not made accused in this case, while the main responsibility of taking care of his wife (deceased) and maintain her dignity is upon her husband. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 17.12.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State, learned counsel for the informant and submitted that the allegation against the petitioner along with others is of assaulting to the deceased, due to which she died and from the perusal of the postmortem report, it appears that the cause of death was haemorrhage as a result of hard and blunt substance.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31455 of 2023(3) dt.25-07-2023 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 361 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T