Patna High CourtC. REV./20/2016dismissed

Hena Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-26Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.20 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 346 of 2014 ====================================================== Hena Ansari, D/o Md. Najamuddin Ansari, Resident of Mohalla - Barbana, P.S. Katihar, District - Katihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Education Officer, Katihar.

4. The District Programme Officer, Hasanganj, Katihar.

5. The Block Development Officer, Hasanganj, Katihar.

6. The Block Education Officer, Hasanganj, District - Katihar.

7. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Jagarnathpur, Hasanganj, Katihar.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Jagarnathpur, Hasanganj, Katihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. S.S.P. Yadav, SC.14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 26-10-2016 Heard Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. S.S.P. Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the State.

Although Mr. Jha learned counsel for the review petitioner endeavours to argue that it is the failure of the petitioner not to ably assist the Court which has led to the passing of the order under review but considering that the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the permission taken after advancing some arguments, coupled with the fact that it has

Patna High Court C. REV. No.20 of 2016 (2) dt.26-10-2016 taken the petitioner more than two years to realize this position, I am not persuaded with the arguments advanced by Mr. Jha. Even otherwise the ground so canvassed by Mr. Jha cannot be a ground for review of an order passed, especially where the counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition after advancing some arguments.

The review application is devoid of merit and is dismissed in limine.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U