Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28520/2019bail granted

Rishabh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28520 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-835 Year-2018 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Rishabh Singh S/o Navendu Singh, R/o Village Rampur, P.O. Ramauli, P.S. Patepur, District Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 835 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 379, 384, 386 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has taken the Scooty of the informant/complainant, who happens to be his wife and not returning the Scooty to her.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that earlier a case under Section 498A of IPC has been filed against the petitioner, in which he is on police bail, thereafter, the present case has been lodged, making false allegation against him.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 also, they have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that the Scooty is still at the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28520 of 2019(4) dt.17-07-2019 2/2 house of the petitioner, but he is not returning the same. Having heard both sides, considering the above submissions, let the petitioner, above named, surrender before the court below by 26.07.2019 and on surrender, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned court below with condition that he is to appear before the I.O. and he will co-operate in the investigation, otherwise, the prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T