Shanu Thakur @ Shalu @ Shalu Thakur @ Vagish Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28531 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-543 Year-2018 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.
Shanu Thakur @ Shalu @ Shalu Thakur @ Vagish Kumar Thakur, aged about 25 years (Male), S/O- Sushil Kumar Thakur, Resident of VillageRaghauli, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. 2.
Chandan Kumar, aged about 29 years (Male), S/O- Mahendra Sah, Resident of village- Purandaha Rajwara, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Hari Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No. 543 of 2018 registered for the offences under Sections 364, 504, 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioners and other accused persons is that they have forcibly lifted the deceased and thereafter, dead body was found.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and they have no motive to kill the deceased.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28531 of 2019(3) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned trial court on its own merit, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Nasimul/- U T