← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40959/2021bail rejected

Md. Mohsin v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-15Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40959 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2021 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Mohsin Son of Md. Zakir Hussian Resident of Village - Bari Chobla, P.S.- Jaitpur, District - Udham Singh Nagar, (Uttarakhand.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kundan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2021 Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Jogbani P.S. Case No. 37 of 2021 corresponding to Special Case No. 07 of 2021, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20, 21-B, 22, 23 of the NDPS Act.

As per the prosecution case, three persons including this petitioner on two motorcycles were apprehended and on search, 50 gms. of Brown Sugar was recovered from possession of this petitioner.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. The alleged recovered Brown Sugar is less than commercial quantity, as such rigorous of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, would not be attracted. Mandatory provision of search and seizure has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40959 of 2021(3) dt.15-11-2021 2/2 not been followed. Petitioner is having clean antecedent and he is in custody since 20.02.2021.

However, counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that huge quantity of narcotic substance, Indian and Nepali currency, ATM card, Driving license, wrist watch, head phone have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.

Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

However, once charge is framed and trial commences, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned trial court on its own satisfaction and on the condition that petitioner will cooperate in disposal of trial and appear before the court, as and when required.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T