Moti Ur Rahman v. Arbind Kumar Chaudhary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.966 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12644 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Moti Ur Rahman, son of Late Nizamuddin, Resident of Village-Bauram, Police Station-Jamalpur, District-Darbhanga holding the post of Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj-Bauram, Block-Gorabauram, District-Darbhanga. 2.

Mohseen Alam, son of Shamshul Haque, Resident of Village-Bauram, Police Station-Jamalpur, District-Darbhanga being Social Worker. ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

1.

Arbind Kumar Chaudhary, The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Rajeev Raushan, The Collector, Darbhanga.

3.

Sanjeev Kumar Kapar, The S.D.O. Biraul, Darbhanga. 4.

Umesh Prasad Singh, The B.D.O. Gaura Bauram, Darbhanga. 5.

Ram Kumar Singh, The Circle Officer, Gaura Bauram, Darbhanga. 6.

Rishi Dev Chaurasia, The Junior Engineer, Electricity, Gaura Bauram, Darbhanga.

7.

Prabash Kumar Ansarul Haque, Junior Engineer, MGNREGA, Gaura Bauram, Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Anjani Kumar (AAG- 4).

For the O.P. No.6 :

Mr. Shreekant Sharan Singh, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 09-04-2024 The present M.J.C./Contempt Petition is filed for noncompliance of the orders of this Court dated 02.08.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No.12644 of 2021.

2. During the pendency of the present M.J.C./ Contempt Petition, the Opposite Party Nos.2 to 5 have filed

Patna High Court MJC No.966 of 2022(6) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 supplementary show cause to the effect that orders of this Court read with petitioners' representation has been considered.

3. Accordingly, the present M.J.C./Contempt Petition stands dropped reserving liberty to the petitioners to assail the respondents' action, if they are aggrieved.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) P.S./- U