Dr. Ramakant Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3284 of 2015 ====================================================== Dr. Ramakant Pandey s/o Late Jamadar Pandey Resident - 165, Kautilya Nagar, Patna - 14.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Chancellor of the Universities, Bihar, Raj Bhawan, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra at Saran.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer Chapra, The Representative of State, the exofficio, member of Governing Body of Lok Mahavidyalaya Hafizpur, Baniapur, Saran.

6. The Principal, Lok Mahavidyalaya Hafizpur, Baniapur, Saran.

7. The Chairman of the Governing Body, Lok Mahavidyalaya Hafizpur, Baniapur, Saran.

8. The Secretary of the Governing Body, Lok Mahavidyalaya Hafizpur, Baniapur, Saran.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh No.1, Advocate Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 5: Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-01-2016 Heard Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh No.1, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, learned Additional Advocate General No.3, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 5.

After some arguments, Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh No.1, learned Counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application, made, under Article 226 of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3284 of 2015 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. However, we make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present writ petition. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U