Mostt . Mira Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1226 of 2015 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8301 of 2010 ====================================================== Mostt . Mira Pathak. Wife of (deceased employee) Late Paras Nath Pathak. Resident of Mohalla - West of D.A.V. High School (Panch Mandir), P.O., P.S. and District - Siwan.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, S.M. Karim Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, S.M. Karim, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.
3. Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar Sri. Achuta Nand Singh, District - Chapra.
4. The Registrar, Sri Achuta Nand Singh, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District - Chapra.
5. Sri T.K. Gupta, The Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, District - Saran at Chapra.
6. Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, through its Registrar, Sri Viveka Nand Shukla, District - Muzaffarpur.
7. Sri Pandit Pandey, the Vice-Chancellor, Baba Saheb Bheem Rao Ambedkar, Bihar University, District - Muzaffarpur.
8. Sri Viveka Nand Shukla, the Registrar, Bheem Rao Ambedkar Bihar University, Muzaffarpur, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Contemnors- Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, A.C. to A.A.G. 13 For the J. P. University :
Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate For the B.R.A. University :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 08-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In view of the order of the Court dated 22.12.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8301 of 2010, having been complied with, the application stands disposed off.
Patna High Court MJC No.1226 of 2015 (4) dt.08-02-2017 2/2 However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move the authorities for claiming interest for delayed payment. It is clarified that the Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of such claim.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U