Jagdish Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40251 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2021 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Jagdish Chaudhary Son of Mahesh Chaudhary Resident of Village- Gulni Dihuri, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Chandauti P.S. Case No. 76 of 2021, registered for the offence punishable punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

10 litres of country made Mahua liquor has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It is submitted that no recovery has been made from conscious possession of this petitioner and he has no concern with the seized liquor. Petitioner is in custody since 17.03.2021 Investigation is complete.

Considering the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40251 of 2021(2) dt.07-10-2021 2/2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge Excise Act, Gaya in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 76 of 2021, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T