Dhananjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4861 of 2015 ====================================================== Dhananjay Kumar, son of Sri Nathuni Sharma, aged about 40 Years, resident of village- Kamta, P.S. - Parasi, District- Arwal (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Department of Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Bihar.
4. The Chief Engineer, Department of Water Resources, Aurangabad, Bihar.
5. The Superintending Engineer, High Level Sone Canal Anchal, Aurangabad, Bihar
6. The Executive Engineer, Patna Sone Canal (East) Daud Nagar, DistrictAurangabad, Bihar.
7. The District Magistrict, Arwal, Bihar.
8. The Anchal Adhikari, Kaler, District- Arwal, Bihar. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhairaw Nand Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Yadav, AAG IX, Mr. P.R. Kumar, A.C. to AAG-IX ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 21-09-2016 Heard Mr. Bhairaw Nand Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. S.D. Yadav, learned AAG No.IX, appearing for the State-respondents.
Having regard to the fact that this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the form of Public Interest Litigation, is vague, we do not find that this writ petition
Patna High Court CWJC No.4861 of 2015 (2) dt.21-09-2016 2/2 calls for any order in exercise of the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. This writ petition is, therefore, closed with liberty given to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U