Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45220 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -120 Year- 2018 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar, son of Rambachan Singh, resident of Village + P.S.- Barun, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barun P.S. Case No.120 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 379, 411, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4/40 of B.M.M.C.R. and Section 15 of Environmental Protection Act. Petitioner is driver of the tractor mentioned at the serial No.5, bearing registration No. BR26K/3664. He was having valid Challan of sand loaded on the tractor.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No.120 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45220 of 2018 (2) dt.09-08-2018 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T