Bambam Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32734 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2018 Thana- DHANKUND District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

BAMBAM SINGH Son of Siyaram Singh Resident of Village-Bajardih, P.S.-Dhankund, District-Banka.

2.

Chandan Singh Son of Siyaram Singh Resident of Village-Bajardih, P.S.- Dhankund, District-Banka.

3.

Bikash Singh Son of Siyaram Singh Resident of Village-Bajardih, P.S.- Dhankund, District-Banka.

4.

Nitya Nand Singh Son of Late Madho Singh Resident of Village-Bajardih, P.S.-Dhankund, District-Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-09-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 147, 148, 341, 323, 435, 436, 504, 506/34 of IPC.

Allegedly, due to altercation between the children, the petitioners assaulted the informant. It is further alleged that after

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32734 of 2022(2) dt.15-09-2022 2/3 assaulting, the petitioners locked the informant in his house and set his house on fire intending to kill him along with his whole family members.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is an admitted land dispute between the parties. There is a case and counter-case between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32734 of 2022(2) dt.15-09-2022 3/3 Court in Dankund P.S. Case No.08 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T