← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29678/2022bail granted

Krishna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-06Mr. Justice Khatim Reza2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29678 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2022 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Madhubani ====================================================== Krishna Kumar Son of Late Sanjay Chaupal Resident of village - Uchchaith Durga Sthan, P.S.- Benipatti, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rita Kumari, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2022 The matter has been heard via Video Conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Rita Kumari, learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 27 liters of Nepali liquor from the motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR32-3346. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has no concern with the seized liquor. It is submitted that mandatory provision of Sub-section 2 of Section 74 and Section 82 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act with respect to search and seizure have not been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29678 of 2022(2) dt.06-08-2022 2/2 followed. Further, it is submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the motorcycle and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner or from the house of the petitioner. It is also stated that the petitioner's name transpired in this case only on the basis of suspicion. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 06.03.2022 and is a person with clean antecedent.

Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Saharghat G.O. Case No. 131 of 2022.

(Khatim Reza, J) shanu/- U T