Satyendra Singh @ Rana Satyendra Kumar Singh @ Satendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29504 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Satyendra Singh @ Rana Satyendra Kumar Singh @ Satendra Singh S/o Late Saheb Singh R/o Village- Kharsari, PS- Kauwakol, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Savita Devi W/o Prabhat Singh R/o vill - Kharsari, P.S.- Kauwakol, Distt.- Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyapal Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kauwakol P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 dated 11.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 65(2), 62, 75(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 8 of POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have attempted to commit rape on the minor daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in this case on mere suspicion. It is further submitted that the victim girl

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29504 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 was brought for medical examination but she refused to do so. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that the victim is a minor girl aged about 9 years. As per para-3, 12 and 13 of the case diary which is mentioned in the impugned order dated 10.03.2025, all the witnesses have supported the prosecution case and it is also evident from the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the specific and heinous nature of offence against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the same is rejected in connection with Kauwakol P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Act), Nawada.

7. The application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T