← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10117/2015disposed

Rangraj Himanshu Shekhar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-23Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10117 of 2015 =========================================================== Rangraj Himanshu Shekhar, son of Sri Kauhlendra Kumar, R/o village and P.O. Ghosi, District - Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar (Secretary Transport Department).

2. South Bihar Regional Transport Authority Patna Commissioner's Compound West Gandhi Maidan Patna.

3. Chairman, South Bihar Regional Transport Authority, Patna Commissioner's Compound West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

4. Secretary, South Bihar Regional Transport Authority Patna Commissioner's Compound West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

5. Motor Vehicle Inspector, Jehanabad

6. Niraj Kumar, son of Priya Ranjan Kr. Pankaj, r/o Mohammadpur, P.S- Kako District- Jehanabad.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shripujan Singh, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harun Quareshi, A.C. to S.C.-01. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 16.05.2015 passed by the Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna, whereby and whereunder permit which was granted to the petitioner vide Permit No.733/13 for the route Meena Bazar to Jehanabad has been cancelled on the ground that the petitioner has obtained the permit by producing forged document and he has not deposited the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10117 of 2015 dt.23-06-2017 2/2 tax amount of Rs.1,44,412/-.

3.

There is an alternative forum where the petitioner can raise his grievance. Let the petitioner file an application before the Motor Vehicle Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. If such an application is filed, the Motor Vehicle Tribunal will look into the grievance of the petitioner and take decision in accordance with law. The Tribunal while considering the question of limitation will take into consideration the pendency of this case before this Court. 4.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 24.06.2017 Transmission Date N/A