Dilkhush Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30651 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-708 Year-2024 Thana- DARIYAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Dilkhush Rai Son of Raju Rai Village -Akilpur, p.s.- Dariyapur, Dist- Saran At Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Rajani Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard Mrs. Rajani Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, learned counsel representing the informant as also learned APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Dariyapur P.S. Case No. 708 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 329(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the of the B.N.S. and section 27 of the Arms Act, lodged on 10.12.2024 by the informant Jitendra Rai.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while at his door, allegation is that the accused persons came and on the order of Suresh Rai, Dilkhush Rai (petitioner) and Jyotish Rai assaulted Kamlesh Rai on the head causing injury. This led to the F.I.R.
4. Earlier the coordinate Bench had called for the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30651 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 diary which is now on record according to which the city scan of the brain was conducted.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to criminal antecedent, he has been implicated, on the other hand, the informant has taken this Court to paragraph no.24 of the case diary to show that when the petitioner was taken into custody, escaped from the police custody.
6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the conduct of the petitioner, couple with the fact that he has number of criminal antecedent under his belt, for the present, no relief can be extended to him.
7. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T