Jalal @ Md. Jalal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2293 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2017 Thana -AMAUR District- PURNIA ======================================================
1. Jalal @ Md. Jalal, son of late Poshan, R/o Village- Rasaili, P.S.- Amour, District- Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Amour P.S. Case No.97 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 307 and other allied sections of Indian Penal Code.
In the written report, it is alleged that co-accused, Pyaru, gave knife blow on the neck of the informant. The informant saved the blow with his hand and sustained cut injury in the right hand as well as on neck.
This petitioner is said to be the father of Pyaru. There is no allegation of any specific overt act against the petitioner.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2293 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Amour P.S. Case No.97 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T