Bijay Paswan @ Bijay Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47841 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2018 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Bijay Paswan @ Bijay Kumar Paswan S/o Late Bhuneshwar Paswan, R/o Vill.- Hasanpur (Ranga), P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Chand Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No. 18 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 427, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of indiscriminate firing and snatched away donation box of the temple.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and there is a case and counter case between the parties and the entire allegation is general and omnibus . It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47841 of 2018 (2) dt.20-08-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No. 18 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T