← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30098/2025bail granted

Mithun Sahani @ Mithun Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-08Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30098 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2025 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Mithun Sahani @ Mithun Sahni S/O Late Lalbabu Sahani @ Lalbahadur Sahani R/o vill - Mehawa, P.S. - Sugauli, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Rathore Alias Kundan Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, total 90 liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle and hut. The petitioner was apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30098 of 2025(2) dt.08-05-2025 2/2 for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not the owner of the motorcycle in question. It is further submitted that the petitioner was a passerby of that way and was apprehended on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T