Parmod Kumar @ Arab Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30771 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2026 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Parmod Kumar @ Arab Kumar son of Dani Prasad @ Danveer Prasad Resident of village - Haidarpur, Ps- Hilsa, Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.02.2026, in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 16.02.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of the B.N.S..

3. The F.I.R. of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of motorcycle bearing No. BR21AJ 8860 which was recovered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30771 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 from the house of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the motorcycle in question belonged to the petitioner and except the aforesaid, nothing has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 17.02.2026.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the mobile in question has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner but fairly submits that the same was not put on test identification parade as yet.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30771 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T