Tanvir Ansari @ Md. Tanvir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35009 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Tanvir Ansari @ Md. Tanvir Son of Md. Minhaz Ansari Resident of VillageKarballa, P.S.- Chakand, Dist.- Gaya, Present address of both - Mohalla Hazi compound, Sona Apartment Room No. 304, Floor Bhimandi, P.S.- Nizampur, Dist.- Mumbai 2.
Tamanna Praveen @ Aasiya Zabi Wife of Tanvir Ansari Resident of VillageKarballa, P.S.- Chakand, Dist.- Gaya, Present address of both - Mohalla Hazi compound, Sona Apartment Room No. 304, Floor Bhimandi, P.S.- Nizampur, Dist.- Mumbai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nidhi Anand, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the OP.No.2 learned counsel for the state.
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 498A, 494, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It appears from the previous order dated 02.07.2025 that an offer was made on behalf of the petitioner no. 1 that he was ready to settle the matter once and for all upon payment of an amount of Rs. 4 lakh and was also agreeable on returning the jewellery of the informant which is in his possession. Today, it has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35009 of 2024(5) dt.23-07-2025 2/3 still agreeable to the same stand. However, due to certain points of interference between the family members, the joint affidavit could not be prepared and filed. However, this order is being passed in the presence of OP.No.2 herself.
4. It is agreed that the petitioner no. 1 would pay an amount of Rs. 4 lakh in four installments and the first installment of Rs. 1 lakh would be paid within a period of six weeks and upon proof of such payment, the petitioner would be released on provisional bail within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No. 44 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.PC.
5. Subsequently, the other three installments of Rs. 1 lakh each would be paid within a period of another four months and upon proof of payment of the same, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall stand confirmed.
6. It is expected that in the meantime, the petitioner would also honour his earlier words and would return the jewellery of OP. No. 2, which is in his possession and in view of such settlement, the OP.No.2, would take all steps for withdrawal of the criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35009 of 2024(5) dt.23-07-2025 3/3 case. The payment of the last installment would however be made after OP.No.2 has taken steps for withdrawal of the criminal case and the application for mutual consent divorce is filed.
8. The application is thus disposed off.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T