Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38857/2024bail rejected

Lango Nishad @ Langra @ Vakil Shahni v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-27Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38857 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2023 Thana- MARANCHI District- Patna ====================================================== Lango Nishad @ Langra @ Vakil Shahni SON OF LATE BHOLA NISHAD R/O VILLAGE PURANI KASHA DIYARA, P.S.- MARANCHI, DISTPATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 27-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Maranchi P.S. Case No.86 of 2023 lodged under sections 25(1b)a/ 26 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against the petitioner against whom there is allegation of recovery of one country made katta and four live cartridges which is subject matter of the present case.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that no cogent material has been recovered from petitioner's possession and he has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38857 of 2024(2) dt.27-05-2024 2/2 case. He submits that the one country made katta and four live cartridges were recovered from straw house.

5. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2023 having 6 criminal antecedent in which he is on bail in all the cases.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected, but liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail 6 months after framing of charge.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T