Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40507 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2018 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Vinod Yadav Son of Ramjeet Yadav @ Ramjit Yadav Resident of VillageMahadeva, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs.Rupa Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Obra P.S. Case No. 243 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. 27 litres of country made liquor and 2.5 quintal of Mahua has been recovered from the field of co-accused Rajendra Yadav and this petitioner is alleged to have run away from the place of recovery.
It is submitted that no recovery has been made from conscious possession of this petitioner and he has been made accused in this case only on suspicion. Recovery has been made from the field of co-accused Rajendra Yadav. Petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2021. Investigation is complete.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40507 of 2021(2) dt.08-10-2021 2/2 Considering the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge VII-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Aurangabad in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 243 of 2018, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T