Sushmita Kiran v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8973 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.
Sushmita Kiran Wife of Sri Ajay Kumar Mehta Resident of Village- Bareo, P.S.- Gaya Mufasil, District- Gaya.
2.
Nikee Kumari Wife of Sri Manoj Kumar Resident of Village- Kujaap, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director, Secondary Education, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Gaya.
4.
The District Education Officer, Gaya.
5.
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gaya. 6.
The Block Education Officer, Town Block, Gaya. 7.
The Gram Panchayat Secretary-cum-Secretary Gram Panchayat Primary Teachers Employment Committee, Ghuthiya, Gaya. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Sri. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Smt. Binita Singh ( SC28 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State.
At the outset, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the issue, raised in the writ application, has already been decided by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 22-07-2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4286 of 2018. It is also submitted that during pendency of the writ petition, respondents have taken a decision to terminate the services of petitioners. Termination order contained in Memo No. 24 dated
Patna High Court CWJC No.8973 of 2019(6) dt.21-01-2021 2/2 11-10-2019, has been brought on record vide Annexure 11 to I.A.No.1/2019.
Learned counsel for the State respondents does not dispute the aforesaid facts and raises no objection. Accordingly, this writ application is allowed in terms of order dated 22-07-2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4286 of 2018. Order of termination dated 11.10.2019 (Annexure 11 to I.A.No.1/2019) is quashed. Respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioners with all consequential benefits. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay/- U