Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45667/2018dismissed

Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mangalam v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-06Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45667 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Rahul Kumar Singh @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mangalam son of Arvind Singh Resident of Village - Khambhar, P.S. Muffasil, District Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Nawkothi P.S. Case No. 21 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that on the point of pistol the petitioner along with other co-accused persons thrown the informant from the vehicle and after tying his hand or leg, they took out his mobile and snatched Rs. 1500/- and fled away with his vehicle.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the parties have already compromised. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45667 of 2018 (2) dt.06-08-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail stating that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

n In view of allegation against the petitioner, above named, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and makes prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T