← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8422/2025withdrawn

Md. Hasim v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-17Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8422 of 2025 ====================================================== Md. Hasim Son of Late Munif Resident of Village- Kabaul, Police StationJamalpur, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Land and Revenue Department, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

3.

The Circle Officer, Kiratpur, Darbhanga.

4.

Kamate Alam, Son of Late Abdul Manan Resident of Village- Kabaul, Police Station- Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga.

5.

Shamse Alam, Son of Late Abdul Manan Resident of Village- Kabaul, Police Station- Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga.

6.

Noor Alam, Son of Late Abdul Manan Resident of Village- Kabaul, Police Station- Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga.

7.

Naushad Alam, Son of Late Abdul Manan Resident of Village- Kabaul, Police Station- Jamalpur, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Ban Bihari Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Government Advocate (3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present application has been preferred: for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari and other appropriate writ for quashing the notice dated 8.4.2025 Where in and whereby the respondent no. 3 demanded relevant document regarding Kheshara No.

4884, 4879, 4885 Thagava situated at Mauza Jhagarua, Jamalpur from the petitioner without initiating any proceeding or any other writ/ writs, order/ orders /

Patna High Court CWJC No.8422 of 2025(2) dt.17-03-2026 2/2 direction/directions which your lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. In the presence of learned State Counsel, Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pramod Ban Bihari Singh prays for withdrawal of the petition as it has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U