← Library
Patna High CourtMA/294/2023withdrawn

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Sindhu Lata

2025-09-22Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Appeal No.294 of 2023 ====================================================== The Oriental Insurance Company Limited having its Regional Office at Pirmohani Chowk, Patna represented through Sri Ajit Prasad working as Dy. Manager, Regional Office, Patna.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

Sindhu Lata Wife of Late Manoranjan Kumar, Resident of Village-Jatkauli, P.O.-Dharampur, P.S. and District-Vaishali.

2.

Sakshi Daughter of Late Manoranjan Kumar, Resident of Village-Jatkauli, P.O.-Dharampur, P.S. and District-Vaishali.

3.

Ashuman, son of Late Manoranjan Kumar, Resident of Village-Jatkauli, P.O.-Dharampur, P.S. and District-Vaishali.

4.

Smt. Geeta Devi Wife of Randhir Sharma, Resident of Village-Jatkauli, P.O.- Dharampur, P.S. and District-Vaishali.

5.

Randhir Sharma, son of Late Sonelal Sharma, Resident of Village-Jatkauli, P.O.-Dharampur, P.S. and District-Vaishali.

6.

Raj Kishore Singh son of Ziyalal Singh, resident of Village-Paharpur, Raghunathpur, District-Muzaffarpur owner of Bolero No. BR-06PA-8511. 7.

Ram Bichar Paswan, son of Late Bhutta Paswan, resident of VillagePaharpur, Raghunathpur, District-Muzaffarpur driver of Bolero No. BR06PA-8511. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"against the judgment dated 18.04.2022 passed in Claim Case No. 118/2012 passed by the learned Additional District JudgeXII-cum-MACT, Hajipur, Vaishali."

Patna High Court MA No.294 of 2023(5) dt.22-09-2025 2/2

3. Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, learned counsel for the appellant submit that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition and the statutory amount be directed to be returned.

4. In that background, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, it is directed that the statutory amount be returned to the appellant.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U