← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36419/2020allowed

Shushma Kumari @ Sushma Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Department, Bihar Patna

2021-05-25Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36419 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2020 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== SHUSHMA KUMARI @ SUSHMA KUMARI, Wife of Deep Narayan Singh, Daughter of Parmanand Singh Resident of Sanjay Nagar, Bageshwari Road, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya, Presently posted as Prakhand Teacher, Middle School, Nima, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE DEPARTMENT, BIHAR PATNA Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-05-2021 Heard Mr. Vikram Deo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, who is a Block Teacher, seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Muffasil P. S. Case No. 34 of 2020, dated 01.02.2020,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36419 of 2020(4) dt.25-05-2021 2/3 instituted for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation against the petitioner is of having tampered with the result of BETET for obtaining appointment as a Niyojit Teacher under the Backward Class Female Category.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the accusation is absolutely misconceived. The petitioner has requisite qualification for being appointed as Block Teacher and the anomaly found in the result is only because of the wrong entry which could be verified from the examination taking body and from the other sources. The prosecution of the petitioner in this case is only because of the mismatch between the roll number and the serial number of the mark-sheet. The petitioner was granted provisional anticipatory bail vide order dated 19.02.2021. Considering the circumstances of the case, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner is, hereby,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36419 of 2020(4) dt.25-05-2021 3/3 confirmed. The petitioner shall remain on the same bailbonds. The application stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) skm/- U T