Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58053 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2017 Thana -PARSABAZAR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Kundan Kumar, son of Vijay Yadav, resident of Village- Chhatna, Police Station- Parsa Bazar, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey For the Opposite Party/ : Dr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No.200 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 448, 341, 323, 354, 379 Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that petitioner is next door neighbour of the informant.

There is general and omnibus allegation that in the night while the informant was sleeping, this petitioner tried to catch hold her hand. When she got awake, he fled away. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58053 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 No.200 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T