Brahmdeo Prasad Alok v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7891 of 2020 ====================================================== Brahmdeo Prasad Alok, S/o Sri Mauze Lal Prasad, Resident of Lane No.2, S.K. Puram, R.P.S. More, Bailey Road, P.O. and P.S.-Danapur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Inspector General of Police (Budget/Appeal/Welfare), Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur Zone, District- Muzaffarpur. 6.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran Range, District- Chapra. 7.

The Superintendent of Police, District- Gopalganj. 8.

The Superintendent of Police, District- Siwan. 9.

The Superintendent of Police, District- Saran. 10.

The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Hathua, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P. K. Verma, AAG-3 Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 24-03-2021 Heard Mr. Y. V. Giri, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

Identical issue was considered by this Court and other co-ordinate Benches of this Court and considering the materials available on record, the writ applications were allowed and the order of termination was set aside.

Altogether 19 such cases involving the punishment of Constable, Assistant Sub-Inspector, Sub-Inspector have been

Patna High Court CWJC No.7891 of 2020(3) dt.24-03-2021 2/2 allowed by this Court as well as other Co-ordinate Benches of this Court. The details there of is incorporated herein below: C.W.J.C. No. 7871 of 2020,C.W.J.C. No. 7883 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7884 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7890 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7906 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7908 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7909 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7910 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7912 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7864 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7865 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7872 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7878 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7880 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7886 of 2020, C.W.J.C. No. 7893 of 2020 and C.W.J.C. No. 7894 of 2020.

In order to maintain consistency, the Court is constrained to allow the writ application in similar terms, as mentioned herein above, and the order as contained in Annexures-10 and 12 are hereby set aside. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner with all consequential benefits.

With the aforesaid, the writ application is allowed and disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U