← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10990/2015disposed

Bazlur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-13Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 10990 of 2015 =========================================================== Bazlur Rahman Son of Late Abdul Rahman Resident of village - Chilhaniya, P.O. Bag Nagar, P.S. Mahalgaon, District - Araria, the retired Clerk, office of the Superintendent of Police, Araria, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Inspector General of Police (Budget/Appeal/Welfare), Bihar, Patna

4. The Deputy Inspector General (Human Rights), Bihar, Patna

5. The Superintendent of Police, Araria, District - Araria .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Chittaranjan Sinha, PAAG II Mr Shashi Shekhar Kr Pd, AC to PAAG II =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner for benefits on account of second and third ACP is covered by the decision of this Court passed in the case of Raktima Rakshit -Versus- State of Bihar & Others decided on 20.10.2014 in the proceedings arising out of CWJC No 22851 of 2013. He submits that the order has been confirmed by the Division Bench in the proceedings arising out of LPA No 394 of 2016 on 24.11.2017. 3 The position is not disputed by the learned counsel for

Patna High Court CWJC No.10990 of 2015 dt.13-08-2018 2/2 the respondent-State.

4 In view of the limited submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is disposed of so that the petitioner's claim for grant of financial progression under the MACP Scheme may be considered by respondent No 3 in light of the legal position as settled in the aforesaid judgments. 5 Let the claim be considered and disposed of expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 14.08.2018 Transmission Date NA