Chitranjan Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46484 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2017 Thana -ALOULI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================
1. Chitranjan Singh, Son of Nageshwar Singh
2. Jag Mohan Singh @ Kaila, Son of Dino Singh Both residents of Village - Nista Haripur, P.S. - Alauli, District - Khagaria, Bihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar-1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Alouli P.S. Case No. 151 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 427, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that there is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners. It has further been submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case. Amrita Devi wife of Dinesh Singh has also filed Alouli P.S. Case No. 153 of 2017 in which the family members of the petitioners have sustained
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46484 of 2017 (3) dt.01-11-2017 2/2 injuries.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Alouli P.S. Case No. 152 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.