Anil Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5118 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Anil Kumar and Ors Son of Shri Vishwanath Prasad, resident of village - Bajidpur, Post - Bajidpur Saidad, P.S. Bidupur, District - Vaishali 2.

Ranbir Singh, Son of Shri Lala Prasad Singh, resident of village P.O. P.S. Desari, District - Vaishali 3.

Shivesh Prasad, Son of Late Bundi Prasad, resident of village - Pachetan, P.O. P.S. Asthawan, District - Nalanda 4.

Alok Kumar Kamal, Son of Late Yadnath Singh, resident of village - Harpur Mukund, P.O. Jafarpatti, P.S. Rajapakar, District - Vaishali 5.

Khagendra Singh, Son of Late Lakshmi Singh, resident of Jafarabad, P.O. P.S. Desari, District - Vaishali 6.

Satyendra Kumar Sinha, Son of Late Brahmadeo Singh, resident of village - Matiya, P.O. P.S. Desari, District - Vaishali 7.

Suresh Kumar Gupta, Son of Late Vishwanath Prasad Gupta, resident of village - Shitalpur Kamalpur, P.O. Bidupur Bazar, P.S. Bidupur, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar & Ors.

2.

Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Bihar, Patna 3.

District Magistrate, District Vaishali '

4.

District Education Officer, District Vaishali 5.

District Programme officer, Establishment, District Vaishali ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha- G.P.-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

2. In view of the counter affidavit filed by the State, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.5118 of 2017(4) dt.08-09-2025 2/2 petitioners have filed the present writ application with a prayer to consider their cases for promotion as the Headmaster as per Rule 9 & 10 of the Primary Schools Teachers Promotion Rules, 2011.

4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the counter affidavit has been filed, stating therein Para-11 that pursuant to decision of the District Teacher Promotion Committee, Vaishali, the District Education Officer has issued promotion order of the petitioner vide different letters which is annexed at Annexure-R/A of the counter affidavit.

5. In view of the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the fact that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, the present writ application is dismissed as infructuous.

6. Accordingly, the present writ application is dismissed as infructuous.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) Siwani/- U